[1]刘富勤,朱永兴.江浙沪地区城市群空间结构优化——基于引力模型和社会网络分析[J].湖北工业大学学报,2023,(2):84-90.
　LIU Fuqin,ZHU Yongxing.study on Spatial Structure Optimization of Urban Agglomerations in JiangsuZhejiangShanghai Regions[J].,2023,(2):84-90.
点击复制

江浙沪地区城市群空间结构优化——基于引力模型和社会网络分析()
分享到：

《湖北工业大学学报》[ISSN:1003-4684/CN:42-1752/Z]

卷:
期数:
2023年第2期
页码:
84-90
栏目:
出版日期:
2023-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
study on Spatial Structure Optimization of Urban Agglomerations  in JiangsuZhejiangShanghai Regions
文章编号:
1003-4684(2023)02-0084-07
作者:
刘富勤; 朱永兴
湖北工业大学土木建筑与环境学院，湖北 武汉 430068
Author(s):
LIU Fuqin ;  ZHU Yongxing
School of Civil Engin.,Architecture and Environment,Hubei Univ.,of Tech.,Wuhan 430068,China
关键词:
江浙沪城市群' target="_blank" rel="external"> FONT-FAMILY: 宋体">江浙沪城市群;  熵值TOPSIS;  空间结构;  社会网络分析
Keywords:
Jiangsu' target="_blank" rel="external"> FONT-FAMILY: 宋体">Jiangsu;  Zhejiang and Shanghai urban agglomerations;  Entropy weight TOPSIS;  Spatial structure of urban agglomeration network;  social network analysis
分类号:
F293
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
     合理有序的空间结构为城市群协调发展提供依据，对空间联系强度和网络特征的分析，可以为城市发展提供借鉴。以江浙沪地区25个城市为例，利用熵值TOPSIS改进空间引力模型，对城市之间的空间联系强度进行计算，绘制空间联系网络图，并对结果进行社会网络分析，为城市群空间结构优化提供建议。研究表明：空间联系强度方面，江浙沪地区城市群，集中在上海、苏州、无锡和常州，呈现由中部向北部和南部，东部向西部递减的趋势。核心[CD*2/3]边缘结构和凝聚子群分析中，城市群圈层结构明显，空间稳定性较好。核心圈层内城市掌握较多资源，整个城市群可分为三个圈层和四个凝聚子群。对此，文章针对每个城市子群提出具体建议。
Abstract:
   A reasonable and orderly spatial structure provides a basis for the coordinated development of urban clusters, and the analysis of spatial linkage intensity and network characteristics can provide a reference for urban development. Taking 25 cities in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai regions as an example, we use entropy value topsis to improve the spatial gravity model, calculate the spatial linkage intensity between cities, draw a spatial linkage network map, and conduct social network analysis on the results to provide suggestions for the optimization of the spatial structure of urban agglomerations. The study shows that: in terms of spatial linkage intensity, the urban agglomerations in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai, concentrated in Shanghai, Suzhou, Wuxi and Changzhou, show a decreasing trend from central to northern and southern, and from eastern to western. In the core edge structure and cohesive subgroup analysis, the city cluster circle structure is obvious and spatial stability is good. Cities within the core rim layer hold more resources, and the whole urban cluster can be divided into three circles and four cohesive subgroups. For this reason, the article makes specific suggestions for each urban subgroup.

参考文献/References:

［1］ 杨迅周, 杨延哲, 刘爱荣. 中原城市群空间整合战略探讨\[J\]. 地域研究与开发, 2004(05):3337.

[2] FRIEDMANN J, MILLER J. The urban field\[J\]. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1965,31(4):312320.

[3] 白永亮, 党彦龙. 长江中游城市群空间作用机理与空间结构研究\[J\]. 宏观经济研究, 2014(11):4758.

[4] 张祥建, 唐炎华, 徐晋. 长江三角洲城市群空间结构演化的产业机理\[J\]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2003(10):6569.

[5] 刘秉镰, 胡玉莹. 现代物流影响城市群空间结构的作用机理\[J\]. 广东社会科学, 2014(04):1424.

[6] 武前波, 刘星. 金融联系视角下沿海发达地区城镇网络空间结构研究——以浙江为例\[J\]. 世界地理研究, 2021,30(05):966977.

[7] 钟业喜, 邵海雁, 徐晨璐. 长江中游城市群空间结构效益比较与优化研究\[J\]. 区域经济评论, 2020(03):7078.

[8] 程钦良, 张亚凡, 宋彦玲. 兰西城市群空间结构演变及优化研究\[J\]. 地域研究与开发, 2020,39(02):5257.

[9] ZHOU H, GAO H. The impact of urban morphology on urban transportation mode: A case study of Tokyo\[J\]. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2020,8(01):197205.

[10] JIA Y, TANG L, XU M, et al. Landscape pattern indices for evaluating urban spatial morphology -A case study of Chinese cities\[J\]. Ecological Indicators, 2019,99:2737.

[11] 马春庆. 基于盈石矩阵的中国城市商服空间供需分析与规划响应\[J\]. 城市发展研究, 2018,25(02):1623.

[12] ZENG C, SONG Y, CAI D, et al. Exploration on the spatial spillover effect of infrastructure network on urbanization: A case study in Wuhan urban agglomeration\[J\]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019,47:101476.

[13] WANG Z, LIANG L, SUN Z, et al. Spatiotemporal differentiation and the factors influencing urbanization and ecological environment synergistic effects within the BeijingTianjinHebei urban agglomeration\[J\]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019,243:227239.

[14] WANG D, NIU Y, QIAN J. Evolution and optimization of China’s urban tourism spatial structure: A high speed rail perspective\[J\]. Tourism Management, 2018,64:218232.

[15] HE J, LI C, YU Y, et al. Measuring urban spatial interaction in Wuhan Urban Agglomeration, Central China: A spatially explicit approach\[J\]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2017,32:569583.

[16] 李陈, 靳相木. 基于引力模型的中心镇空间联系测度研究——以浙江省金华市25个中心镇为例\[J\]. 地理科学, 2016,36(05):724732.

[17] ZHOU T, JIANG G, ZHANG R, et al. Addressing the rural in situ urbanization (RISU) in the beijingtianjinhebei region: spatiotemporal pattern and driving mechanism\[J\]. Cities, 2018,75:5971.

[18] HUANG Z, DU X, CASTILLO C S Z. How does urbanization affect farmland protection? Evidence from China\[J\]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2019,145:139147.

[19] GUAN X, WEI H, LU S, et al. Mismatch distribution of population and industry in China: Pattern, problems and driving factors\[J\]. Applied Geography, 2018,97:6174.

[20] WANG Y, HU H, DAI W, et al. Evaluation of industrial green development and industrial green competitiveness: Evidence from Chinese urban agglomerations\[J\]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,124:107371.

[21] BENTEZANDRADES J A, GARCARODRíGUEZ I, BENAVIDES C, et al. Social network analysis for personalized characterization and risk assessment of alcohol use disorders in adolescents using semantic technologies\[J\]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2020,106:154170.

[22] THERRIEN M, JUTRAS M, USHER S. Including quality in Social network analysis to foster dialogue in urban resilience and adaptation policies\[J\]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2019,93:110.

[23] KURT Y, KURT M. Social network analysis in international business research: An assessment of the current state of play and future research directions\[J\]. International Business Review, 2020,29(02):101633.

[24] 刘军. 整体网分析 UCINET软件实用指南\[M\]. 第2版.上海：格致出版社；上海人民出版社, 2014.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈厚廷,李 昊,张麦宣,等.基于VISSIM仿真的混行交叉口优化研究 [J].湖北工业大学学报,2023,(2):79.
　CHEN Houting,LI Hao,ZHANG Maixuan,et al.Research on Mixed Intersection Optimization based on VISSIM Simulation[J].,2023,(2):79.
[2]邹贻权,张若涵. 基于组合赋权的装配式建筑风险因素研究[J].湖北工业大学学报,2023,(2):91.
　ZOU Yiquan,ZHANG Ruohan.Study on Life Cycle Risk Factors of Prefabricated Buildings [JZ] Based on Combination Weighting[J].,2023,(2):91.
[3]席 榕,刘富勤. 基于演化博弈的全过程工程咨询项目合谋问题研究[J].湖北工业大学学报,2023,(2):97.
　XI Rong,LIU Fuqin.Research on Collusion of Whole Process Engineering[JZ]Consulting Project Based on Evolutionary Game[J].,2023,(2):97.
[4]徐小雅,胡超竹,李翰芳.基于主成分的省域3E系统耦合协调度研究[J].湖北工业大学学报,2023,(2):103.
　XU Xiaoya,HU Chaozhu,LI Hanfang.An Empirical Study on Coupling Coordination Degree of Provincial 3ESystem Based on Principal Component Analysis[J].,2023,(2):103.
[5]赵斌,谢仁雄.共享自行车分区域动态调度优化[J].湖北工业大学学报,2023,(2):116.
　ZHAO Bin,XIE Renxiong.Dynamic Scheduling Optimization of Shared Bicycles[JZ]in Different Regions[J].,2023,(2):116.
[6]宋庭新,肖立柯.基于个性课程推荐技术的线上学习地图设计[J].湖北工业大学学报,2023,(3):108.
　SONG Tinxin,XIAO Like.Design of Online Learning Map Based on Personalized [JZ]Course Recommendation Technology[J].,2023,(2):108.
[7]黄金芳,张小华.中职教师实践教学能力对学业表现的影响——学生满意度的中介效应[J].湖北工业大学学报,2023,(3):114.
　HUANG Jinfang,ZHANG Xiaohua.The Effect of Secondary Vocational Teachers’ Practical Teaching Ability on Academic Performance[J].,2023,(2):114.
[8]姚德明,赵含笑. 数字领导力与员工数字化创造力—— 一个有调节的链式中介模型[J].湖北工业大学学报,2023,(6):7.
　YAO Deming,ZHAO Hanxiao.Digital Leadership and Employees’ Digital Creativity—A Moderated Chain Mediation Model[J].,2023,(2):7.
[9]钱红光,朱文玉.企业金融化、融资融券与技术创新[J].湖北工业大学学报,2023,(6):12.
　QIAN Hongguang,ZHU Wenyu.Enterprise Financialization, Margin Trading and Technological Innovation[J].,2023,(2):12.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

［收稿日期］  2022-11[-08

 基金项目］ 湖北省教研项目（2020464）

 ［第一作者］ 刘富勤（1971年-），女，河南信阳人，湖北工业大学副教授，研究方向为工程管理

 ［通信作者］ 朱永兴（1994年-），男，山东新泰人，湖北工业大学硕士研究生，研究方向为工程管理

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-06-30