[1]陈 彧,秦有缘.中外学者学术期刊论文立场标记语使用研究[J].湖北工业大学学报,2019,34(6):63-66.
　CHEN Yu,QIN Youyuan.A Contrastive Study on Stance Markers in English Academic Journal Articles Written by Chinese Scholars and Native English Scholars[J].,2019,34(6):63-66.
点击复制

中外学者学术期刊论文立场标记语使用研究()
分享到：

《湖北工业大学学报》[ISSN:1003-4684/CN:42-1752/Z]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2019年第6期
页码:
63-66
栏目:
湖北工业大学学报
出版日期:
2019-12-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Contrastive Study on Stance Markers in English Academic Journal Articles Written by Chinese Scholars and Native English Scholars
文章编号:
1003-4684(2019)06-0063-04
作者:
陈  彧;  秦有缘
湖北工业大学外国语学院， 湖北 武汉 430068
Author(s):
CHEN Yu; QIN Youyuan
School of Foreign Languages, Hubei Univ. of Tech., Wuhan 430068, China
关键词:
学术期刊论文;  立场;  立场标记语
Keywords:
academic journal paper;  stance;  stance marker
分类号:
H315.9
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于自建语料库，对比英语母语作者和汉语母语作者在英文学术期刊论文中立场标记语的使用，探讨中外学者学术立场构建策略差异。结果表明，从使用频率看两类作者差异不大，但在具体类别标记语的使用上存在区别。分析中国学者母语学术写作中立场标记语的使用特征，探讨母语及母语写作模式对其英语写作的影响，为英汉语母语学者学术立场构建策略异同提供解释。
Abstract:
The basic purpose of academic writing is to present research findings, while the well-formed stance, referring to the expressions of author’s view, certainty degree, value judgment and emotional attitude to research outcome, stimulates the communication and acceptation of academic findings. Based on three self-established corpora, this paper explored the differences of academic stance formation strategies between Chinese native writers and English native writers by comparing and contrasting their use of stance markers in the concluding part of papers published in English international academic journals. The results indicated the use differences of stance markers lie both in categories and in frequency. This paper also analyzed the use of stance markers in the concluding part of Chinese journal papers to test whether Chinese scholars’ English academic writing is affected by their Chinese thinking and writing patterns，then the results were applied to explain the revealed differences in the formation pattern of academic stance between Chinese native writers and English native writers.

参考文献/References:

[1] Biber D, Finegan E. Adverbial stance types in English [J]. Discourse Processes，1988，11(1): 1-34.
[2] Biber D,Finegan E. Styles of stance in English: lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect[J].Text,1989，9(1): 93-124.
[3] Du Bois J W. The stance triangle [A]. In R.Englebretson (eds.), stance-taking in discourse: subjectivity, evaluation, interaction[C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company,2007:139-182.
[4] Hyland K. Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing [J]. Journal of Pragmatics，2002, 34:1091-1112. 
[5] Hyland K. Disciplinary voices: interactions in research writing. english text construction[J]. 2008(1): 5-22.
[6] Hyland K. Persuasion, Interaction and the construction of knowledge: representing self and others in research writing[J].International Journal of English Studies, 2008b,8(2): 1-23.
[7] 刘成.基于语料库的学术论文摘要中的立场标记语比较研究[D].南京：东南大学,2015.
[8] 柳淑芬.中英新闻标题中的话语立场标记语特征探析[J].湖南工程学院学报(社会科学版),2017,27(4):36-41.
[9] 徐宏亮.中国高级英语学习者学术语篇中的作者立场标记语的使用特点——一项基于语料库的对比研究[J].外语教学,2011,32(6):44-48.
[10] 夏梦茹. 性别差异视角下立场标记语的使用特征[D].上海：东华大学,2016.
[11] 钱家骏,穆从军.中外学者学术论文写作立场表达强度和方式比较——基于自建语料库的汉语学术语篇引言英译研究[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2017,40(5):29-37.
[12] 魏宗磊.中英农业学术论文结论部分的对比分析[D].重庆：重庆大学,2014.
[13] Hyland, K. Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse [J].Discourse Studies, 2005,7(2):173-192.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
［收稿日期］ 2019-09-03
［基金项目］ 湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(19Y041)；湖北省教育科学规划重点项目（2017ZA013）
［第一作者］ 陈    彧(1972-)， 女，湖北工业大学副教授，研究方向为应用语言学，外语教育
［通信作者］ 秦有缘(1997-)， 女，湖北工业大学硕士研究生，研究方向为应用语言学，外语教育
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-09