[1]张桂平,兰 珊.非伦理型人力资源管理与员工安全行为研究[J].湖北工业大学学报,2020,(3):24-28.
ZHANG Guiping,LAN Shan.Non-ethicsHRM Practices and Employees Safety Behavior[J].,2020,(3):24-28.
点击复制
非伦理型人力资源管理与员工安全行为研究(
)
《湖北工业大学学报》[ISSN:1003-4684/CN:42-1752/Z]
- 卷:
-
- 期数:
-
2020年第3期
- 页码:
-
24-28
- 栏目:
-
湖北工业大学学报
- 出版日期:
-
2020-06-30
文章信息/Info
- Title:
-
Non-ethicsHRM Practices and Employees Safety Behavior
- 文章编号:
-
1003-4684(2020)03-0024-05
- 作者:
-
张桂平; 兰 珊
-
湖北工业大学经济与管理学院， 湖北 武汉 430068
- Author(s):
-
ZHANG Guiping; LAN Shan
-
School of Economics and Management， Hubei Univ. of Tech.， Wuhan 430068， China
-
- 关键词:
-
非伦理型; 人力资源管理; 员工安全行为; 安全气候
- Keywords:
-
non-ethicshuman resource management practices; employees safety behavior; construal level theory; safety climate
- 分类号:
-
F272
- 文献标志码:
-
A
- 摘要:
-
以非伦理型人力资源管理实践为研究背景， 基于解释水平理论和资源保存理论的视角， 构建非伦理型的人力资源管理实践对员工安全行为的影响机制模型。 研究结果表明：非伦理型的绩效考核、绩效薪酬管理、组织培训和工作设计负向影响员工的安全行为， 而组织伦理气候、员工道德推脱和保护性价值观在此过程中起中介作用。
- Abstract:
-
It is a serious problem that the casualty occurred frequently at the workplace in China. It has become the common attention how to increase safety behaviors of employees in the theory and practical areas. Although the impact of non-ethicsHRM practices on employee safety behaviors has attracted the attention from the academic community， the relevant impact mechanism research has been relatively rare so far. From the perspective of interpretation level theory and resource conservation theory， this paper systematically constructs the influence mechanism model of non-ethicshuman resource management practice on employee safety behavior. This paper will study the following questions based on construal level theory: 1) to review the background and connotation of non-ethicsHRM practices; 2) to analyze the effect of non-ethicshuman resource management on safety behaviors from four aspects of performance appraisal， performance salary management， organizational training and job design， and to discuss the mediating role of organizational ethics climate， and the mechanism mediating role of ethical climate， moral disengagement and protective value; 3) to discuss whether the variables of demography and organization have a notable and different influence to the safety behaviors and non-ethicshuman resource management. Based on the result of theoretical and practical analysis， a series of policies and advice will be put out， and will provide insightful theoretical and empirical contribution for the safety management Chinese enterprises.
参考文献/References:
[1] Wallace J C， Popp E， Mondore S. Safety climate as a mediator between foundation climates and occupational accidents: a group-level investigation [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology， 2006， 91(3): 681-688.
[2] Katz-Navon T， Naveh E， Stern， Z. Active learning: when is better? The case of resident physicians’ medical errors [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology， 2009， 94(5): 1200-1209.
[3] Nahrgang J D. Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands， job resources， burnout， engagement， and safety outcomes [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology， 2011， 96(1): 71-94.
[4] Parboteeah K P， Kapp E A. Ethical climates and workplace safety behaviors: an empirical investigation [J]. Journal of Business Ethics， 2008， 80(3): 515-529.
[5] Sutcliffe K M， Barton M A. Overcoming dysfunctional momentum: organizational safety as a social achievement [J]. Human Relations， 2009， 62(9): 1327-1356.
[6] Hobfoll S E. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress [J]. American Psychologist， 1989， 44(3): 513-524.
[7] 文鹏， 廖建桥. 不同类型绩效考核对员工考核反应的差异性影响-考核目的视角下的研究 [J]. 南开管理评论， 2010， 13(2): 142-150.
[8] Sutcliffe K M， Barton M A. Overcoming dysfunctional momentum: organizational safety as a social achievement [J]. Human Relations， 2009， 62(9): 1327-1356.
[9] 黄俊， 李晔， 张宏伟. 解释水平理论的应用及发展 [J].心理科学进展， 2015， 23(1): 110-119.
[10] Burke M J， Salvador R O， Smithcrowe K,et al. Sonesh S. The dread factor: how hazards and safety training influence learning and performance [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology， 2011， 96(1): 46-70.
[11] Leroy H， Dierynck B， Anseel F， et al. Behavioral integrity for safety， priority of safety， psychological safety， and patient safety: a team-level study [J]. Journal of applied psychology， 2012， 97(6): 1273-1281.
[12] Bandura A. Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities [J]. Personality and Social Psychology review， 1999， 3(3): 193-209.
[13] 张玥， 窦东徽， 辛自强. 解释水平对自我控制的影响 [J]. 心理科学学报， 2018， 26(10): 1878-1889.
[14] Van Houwelingen， Van Dijke M， DE C D. Getting it done and getting it right: Leader disciplinary reactions to Followers’ moral transgressions are determined by construal level mindset [J]. The Leadership Quarterly， 2015， 26(5): 878-891.
[15] 陈默， 梁建. 高绩效要求与亲组织不道德行为: 基于社会认知理论的视角 [J]. 心理学报， 2017， 49(1): 94-105.
[16] Eyal T， Sagristano M D， Trope Y， et al. When values matter: expressing values in behavioral intentions for the near vs. distant future [J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology， 2009， 45(1): 35-43.
[17] Pek S， Turner N， Tucker S， et al. Injunctive safety norms， young worker risk-taking behaviors， and workplace injuries [J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention， 2017， 106: 202-210.
[18] Breslin F C， Day D， Tompa E， et al. Non-agricultural work injuries among youth: a systematic review [J]. American journal of preventive medicine， 2007， 32(2): 151-162.
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
-
［收稿日期］ 2019-09-20
［基金项目］ 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(17YJA630129)
［第一作者］ 张桂平(1975-)， 女， 河北衡水人， 湖北工业大学教授， 研究方向为人力资源
更新日期/Last Update:
2020-07-03