[1]习常志,朱 蕾,卿 菁,等.不平衡推力法与简布法的比较分析[J].湖北工业大学学报,2020,(1):59-63.
 XI Changzhi,ZHU Lei,QING Jing,et al.Comparative Analysis of Unbalanced Thrust Method and Janbu Method[J].,2020,(1):59-63.
点击复制

不平衡推力法与简布法的比较分析()
分享到:

《湖北工业大学学报》[ISSN:1003-4684/CN:42-1752/Z]

卷:
期数:
2020年第1期
页码:
59-63
栏目:
湖北工业大学学报
出版日期:
2020-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative Analysis of Unbalanced Thrust Method and Janbu Method
文章编号:
1003-4684(2020)01-0059-05
作者:
习常志 朱 蕾 卿 菁 卢应发
湖北工业大学土木建筑与环境学院, 湖北 武汉 430068
Author(s):
XI Changzhi ZHU Lei QING Jing LU Yingfa
School of Civil Engin.,Architecture and Environment,Hubei Univ. of Tech.,Wuhan 430068,China
关键词:
渐进破坏 部分强度折减 稳定性评价 滑坡
Keywords:
progressive failure partial strength reduction methodsafety factor evaluationlandslide
分类号:
TU43
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
采用传统的不平衡推力法及Janbu(简布)法改进之后对应的部分强度折减法,分别对杨家沱滑坡稳定性进行了分析,对比研究结果可得:经折减后的不平衡推力法和简布法计算出的推力均随临界状态点位置变化呈现增长趋势,当最后一个条块达到临界状态时,此时算出的稳定系数则是滑坡的整体稳定性系数。计算出简布法的强度折减稳定系数比不平衡推力法大,同样可界定滑坡的稳定状态,演示了滑坡的逐步渐进破坏过程。
Abstract:
In this paper, the stability of Yangjiatuo landslide is analyzed by partial strength reduction method, including unbalanced thrust method and Janbu method. The results show that the unbalanced thrust increases with the position of the critical state point. When the last block reaches the critical state, the stability coefficient calculated is the landslide. The overall stability coefficient is calculated, and the strength reduction stability coefficient of the simplified method is larger than that of the unbalanced thrust method. At the same time, the stability of the landslide can be calculated, which can also be used to stabilize the stability of the landslide. It shows that the landslide is progressively destroyed. The strength reduction method of some slices can approximately reflect the destroying trend of the landslide.

参考文献/References:

[1] 黄润秋. 20世纪以来中国的大型滑坡及其发生机制 [J ]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2006,26(3):433-454.
[2 ] 谢健全.地质灾害防治工程技术及措施分析 [J ].低碳世界,2018(5):351-352.
[3 ] 卢应发,刘德富,石峻峰.基于牵引式斜坡变形破坏机理的稳定性分析和预测预警方法:中国,ZL201410180387.3 [P ].2014-07-23.
[4 ] 卢应发,石峻峰,刘德富.一种边坡稳定性计算的滑面边界法:中国,ZL20141002508.1.0 [P ].2014-04-16.
[5 ] 卢应发,石峻峰,刘德富.基于边坡变形破坏机理的临界位移预测预警方法:中国,ZL201410014057.7 [P ].2014-04-09.
[6 ] 殷坤龙. 降雨对滑坡的作用机理及动态模拟研究 [J ].地质科技情报,2002,21(1): 75-78.
[7 ] 姚海林,郑少河,陈守义. 考虑裂隙对雨水入渗影响的膨胀土边坡稳定性分析 [J ]. 岩土工程学报,2001,23(5):606-609.
[8 ] 卢应发, 邓国栋, 杨丽平, 等. 滑坡的关键块力学行为及力传递特征和不同应力状态的稳定系数研究 [J ]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014,33(5):884-891.
[9 ] ZHU Dayong, Qian Qihu. Rigorous and quasi-rigorous limit equilibrium solutions of 3D slope stability and application to engineering [J ]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2007,26(8):1513-1528.
[10 ] LI Ning,Qian Qihu, Four criteria of stability analysis and assessment of high rock slope [J ]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2010,29(9):1754-1759.
[11 ] 周跃峰,谭国焕,甄伟文,等.入渗诱发黄土滑坡的力学机制 [J ].岩土力学,2013,34(11):3173-3179+3186.
[12 ] 柴海峰,申月芳,郭磊,等.临界状态下滑坡稳定性分析方法研究 [J ].长江科学院院报,2013,30(05):70-75+91.
[13 ] 杨丽平.一种黄土滑坡渐进破坏过程分析 [J ].岩土力学,2018,39(7):2591-2598.
[14 ] 王振,叶晓明,刘永新.考虑滑坡渐进破坏的改进简布条分法 [J ].岩土力学,2018,39(2):675-682.
[15 ] LU Yingfa. Mechanism and stability analyses of progressive failure of pull-type landslide [J ]. Proceedings of the third Academic Conference of Geology Resource Management and Sustainable Development, 2015,2(1):281-291.

相似文献/References:

[1]江 昊,卢应发.全新剪应力本构模型下的王家岭滑坡稳定性分析[J].湖北工业大学学报,2020,(2):70.
 JIANG Hao,LU Yingfa.Stability Analysis of Wangjialing Landslide Based on New Shear Stress Constitutive Model[J].,2020,(1):70.
[2]胡 鹏. 基于条分法对边坡渐进破坏分析及多参量评价[J].湖北工业大学学报,2022,(2):75.
 HU Peng. Progressive Destruction Analysis and Multi-parameter Evaluation of Slopes Based on Slice Method[J].,2022,(1):75.
[3]夏承志,张凌晨,邹先进,等.基于部分强度折减法的白果树滑坡稳定性分析[J].湖北工业大学学报,2019,34(4):86.
 XIA Chengzhi,ZHANG Lingchen,ZOU Xianjin,et al.Stability Analysis of Baiguoshu Landslide Based on Partial Strength Reduction Method[J].,2019,34(1):86.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
[收稿日期] 2019-09-09
[基金项目] 国家自然科学基金面上项目(41372363); 国家自然科学基金主任基金(41641027); 三峡后续工作地质灾害防治项目(0001212015CC60005)
[第一作者] 习常志(1994-), 男, 湖北荆州人,湖北工业大学硕士研究生,研究方向为岩土力学
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-11